For a gaming TV that can serve both PS5 and Xbox, I’d start with these two iFFALCON U85 MiniLED models. The 65-inch 65U85 is my Best Overall pick for a larger viewing area and a stated 288Hz VRR ceiling; the 55-inch 55U85 is the better fit for a smaller room, with a still-fast 144Hz panel and a stated 240Hz acceleration figure. Both list four HDMI 2.1 ports, local dimming, Dolby Vision Gaming, and ALLM, making either a flexible console-and-streaming setup.
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The main choice is not a simple performance contest: both models share much of the gaming platform, while screen size, contrast figures, and the listed higher refresh-rate acceleration differ. I’d choose the 65-inch model when a more expansive image matters and the room supports it. I’d choose the 55-inch model when seating is closer or the TV needs to fit a compact space. In either case, treat the stated maximum refresh figures as manufacturer specifications, not a promise that PS5 or Xbox games will run at those rates; console output and game support set practical limits.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- 65U85 is the larger-screen pick: its 65-inch MiniLED panel and listed 7,000:1 contrast ratio make it the stronger fit for a spacious living room.
- 55U85 suits tighter setups: the 55-inch screen is easier to place at closer seating distances, while keeping the core 144Hz, VRR, and HDMI 2.1 feature set.
- Both claim four HDMI 2.1 inputs: two are specified for up to 4K at 144Hz, while the other two are specified for 4K at 60Hz.
- Don’t choose by the headline acceleration figure alone: the 65U85 lists VRR up to 288Hz and the 55U85 lists up to 240Hz, but PS5 and Xbox games do not automatically use those maximums.
- Both add movie and smart-TV features: Dolby Vision options, Google TV, and a 50W 2.1-channel audio system make either more versatile than a gaming-only display.
| iFFALCON 65″ 4K MiniLED Smart TV, 65U85 |  | Best Overall — larger-screen gaming with the strongest listed contrast | Screen size: 65 inches | Resolution: 4K | Panel and backlight: MiniLED with local dimming | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| iFFALCON 55″ 4K MiniLED Smart TV, 55U85 |  | Best for Compact Rooms — full U85 gaming essentials in a smaller footprint | Screen size: 55 inches | Resolution: 4K | Panel and backlight: MiniLED with local dimming | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| gaming tv for ps5 and xbox | Screen size | Resolution | Panel and backlight | Native refresh rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iFFALCON 65" 4K MiniLED Smart | 65 inches | 4K | MiniLED with local dimming | 144Hz |
| iFFALCON 55" 4K MiniLED Smart | 55 inches | 4K | MiniLED with local dimming | 144Hz |
More Details on Our Top Picks
iFFALCON 65″ 4K MiniLED Smart TV, 65U85
I rank the 65U85 Best Overall because it pairs the U85 gaming feature set with a 65-inch screen that makes single-player worlds and split-screen sessions feel more expansive. Its supplied specifications list a native 144Hz MiniLED panel, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, local dimming, and up to 1,000 nits of HDR brightness. For PS5 and Xbox, the practical draw is the combination of motion support and two HDMI inputs specified for 4K at 144Hz—not a guarantee that every console game will reach 144 frames per second.
Against the 55U85, this model gives you more screen area and a listed 7,000:1 contrast ratio rather than 6,000:1. That makes it the more compelling pick for a larger room or viewers who sit farther back. Both models claim four HDMI 2.1 ports, Dolby Vision Gaming, ALLM, and a 50W 2.1-channel sound system, so the 65-inch version does not leave the smaller model behind on the central gaming features. The difference is mostly scale and the stated contrast figure, not a wholly different gaming platform.
The tradeoff is physical fit: a 65-inch TV needs more wall or stand space and can dominate a compact room. Its other headline distinction is VRR “up to 288Hz,” but the native panel is listed at 144Hz, and console games are bounded by their own output modes. I would not buy it just to chase that maximum. The Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Vision Gaming, and HDR10+ support broaden its appeal for movies, while Google TV, Alexa and Google Assistant support, AirPlay 2, and Chromecast add everyday convenience. If a smaller screen better matches your viewing distance, the 55U85 keeps the key gaming connections in a less imposing size.
One unusual extra is hotel mode with IP and IR control, which may suit managed displays or short-stay properties as well as homes. For a typical console owner, that feature is secondary; I’d focus on the screen size, available HDMI bandwidth, and whether your setup benefits from an external sound system through eARC. The built-in audio is a useful starting point, but its 50W rating alone cannot guarantee a particular room’s sound quality.
Pros:- 65-inch 4K MiniLED screen with local dimming and a listed 1,000-nit maximum brightness.
- Four HDMI 2.1 inputs are claimed, including two specified for 4K at 144Hz.
- Native 144Hz panel, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, and ALLM support.
- Dolby Vision Gaming, Google TV, and 50W 2.1-channel audio broaden its use beyond consoles.
Cons:- The 65-inch size needs more viewing and installation space than the 55U85.
- The 288Hz figure exceeds the listed native 144Hz panel rate and may not translate to console gameplay.
- Only two HDMI ports are specified for 4K at 144Hz; the other two are listed at 4K at 60Hz.
Best for: Console players who want a large living-room screen, use multiple HDMI devices, and value a higher listed contrast figure than the 55-inch alternative.
Not ideal for: Buyers with limited stand or wall space, close seating in a small room, or anyone choosing solely for the 288Hz headline rather than the native 144Hz panel and actual console modes.
- Screen size:65 inches
- Resolution:4K
- Panel and backlight:MiniLED with local dimming
- Native refresh rate:144Hz
- VRR claim:Up to 288Hz stated; native panel listed at 144Hz
- HDMI:Four HDMI 2.1 ports claimed; two specified for 4K at 144Hz and two for 4K at 60Hz
- HDR formats:Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Vision Gaming, HDR10+, IMAX Enhanced
- Audio:50W, 2.1-channel; Dolby Atmos and DTS Virtual:X
Our verdict“I’d choose the 65U85 for a room that can make good use of its larger screen, while treating its 288Hz claim as secondary to its native 144Hz panel and HDMI setup.”
iFFALCON 55″ 4K MiniLED Smart TV, 55U85
The 55U85 is my Best for Compact Rooms pick. It keeps the central gaming features of the 65U85—native 144Hz, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, ALLM, local dimming, and four claimed HDMI 2.1 ports—while trimming the screen to 55 inches. That size is easier to place in a bedroom, apartment living room, or desk-adjacent setup, and it can be a better match when the seating distance is short. The smaller panel does not mean giving up the U85’s stated 4K at 144Hz capability on two HDMI ports.
Compared with its 65-inch sibling, this version has a listed 6,000:1 contrast ratio rather than 7,000:1, and its description gives a 240Hz acceleration figure rather than 288Hz. Both retain a stated 1,000-nit maximum brightness and the same broad mix of Dolby Vision features, HDR10+, and IMAX Enhanced. The higher acceleration figure on the 65U85 is not enough by itself to make that set a better console TV: the supplied native panel rate is 144Hz for both, and the consoles and games determine usable output modes.
For a PS5 or Xbox setup, the 55U85’s clearest advantage is how easily it fits a tighter space without dropping the features that matter most for modern gaming. Its two higher-bandwidth ports may handle a console and another compatible device, while the remaining ports are listed for 4K at 60Hz. Check which port supports eARC before finalizing a soundbar arrangement; the product information identifies HDMI 4 for eARC. That port allocation means not every input has the same stated maximum, despite the four-port HDMI 2.1 claim.
The compromise is immersion: if you have a large room and sit far from the screen, the 65U85 is likely the more satisfying size. The 55U85 also carries a 50W 2.1-channel speaker system, Google TV, voice control, AirPlay 2, and Chromecast, so it can cover streaming and basic room audio without extra boxes. As with the larger model, listed speaker power and format support do not replace a dedicated soundbar for buyers who want fuller or more room-filling sound. I’d choose this version for fit and shared gaming features, not as a way to chase the 240Hz claim.
Pros:- 55-inch 4K MiniLED format is easier to accommodate in smaller rooms than the 65U85.
- Shares the native 144Hz panel, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, and ALLM claims of its larger sibling.
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports are claimed, with two specified for 4K at 144Hz.
- Includes Dolby Vision Gaming, Google TV, and a 50W 2.1-channel audio system.
Cons:- Smaller image is less immersive for distant seating than the 65U85.
- Its listed 6,000:1 contrast ratio is below the 65U85’s stated 7,000:1.
- The 240Hz acceleration claim is above the native 144Hz rate and does not promise equivalent console frame rates.
Best for: PS5 and Xbox owners who sit relatively close, have limited furniture or wall space, and want the U85’s core gaming connectivity in a 55-inch screen.
Not ideal for: Buyers who sit far away and want a larger cinematic image, or those who expect the 240Hz acceleration figure to mean console games will run at 240 frames per second.
- Screen size:55 inches
- Resolution:4K
- Panel and backlight:MiniLED with local dimming
- Native refresh rate:144Hz
- VRR and acceleration claim:VRR; up to 240Hz DLG acceleration stated
- HDMI:Four HDMI 2.1 ports claimed; two specified for 4K at 144Hz and two for 4K at 60Hz
- HDR formats:Dolby Vision, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Vision Gaming, HDR10+, IMAX Enhanced
- Audio:50W, 2.1-channel; Dolby Atmos and DTS Virtual:X
Our verdict“I’d pick the 55U85 when room fit and closer viewing matter more than the larger, higher-contrast presentation of the 65U85.”
How We Picked
I ranked these two TVs around the needs of a PS5 or Xbox owner: a responsive gaming mode, variable refresh support, modern HDMI connectivity, and a screen size that suits the room. I also weighed how each set handles non-gaming use, since a living-room console TV often doubles as the household streaming screen. The U85 models share their core gaming features, so I give the larger 65U85 the lead for its more immersive screen and higher listed contrast ratio, while keeping the 55U85 as the more room-conscious choice.
I used the supplied product specifications and descriptions rather than treating headline language as independent test results. Both are described as having native 144Hz panels, VRR, FreeSync Premium Pro, ALLM, local dimming, and four HDMI 2.1 ports. The provided descriptions also name two ports with 4K at 144Hz capability and two with 4K at 60Hz capability. Those distinctions matter if you plan to connect multiple devices, but I would still check the port labels and setup documentation before wiring a console, PC, and eARC audio device together.
I did not rank either model on assumed picture measurements, input-lag testing, or a console feature that the supplied information does not confirm. The listed 288Hz and 240Hz figures appear alongside DLG acceleration or maximum VRR claims, while the native panel figure is 144Hz. For console buyers, I treat those higher figures as a secondary distinction rather than proof of higher console frame rates. The practical ranking puts screen fit and the shared HDMI 2.1 and VRR foundation ahead of a headline number that may not apply to a given game.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Gaming Tv For Ps5 And Xbox
With just two sizes in this comparison, I’d make the decision in this order: match the screen to the room, verify the ports you need, then judge the refresh and HDR claims against your console and games. Both iFFALCON U85 TVs have a similar stated gaming foundation, so screen fit is the easiest meaningful distinction.
Choose screen size around your room and seating
The 65U85 is the better starting point when you want a larger shared-screen experience and have enough distance to sit comfortably. It also has the higher listed contrast ratio of these two models. The 55U85 makes more sense for a smaller room, closer seating, or a setup where the TV must fit an existing cabinet. Bigger is not automatically better if the screen overwhelms the room or forces an awkward viewing position. I’d measure the available width and height, account for the stand or wall mount, and compare that space with the listed dimensions before ordering.
Read refresh-rate claims in console context
Both descriptions list a native 144Hz panel, VRR, and higher maximum figures: up to 288Hz for the 65-inch model and up to 240Hz DLG acceleration for the 55-inch version. Those numbers describe manufacturer claims, not the frame rate a PS5 or Xbox game will necessarily deliver. Console output modes and the game itself set the practical ceiling. For console buyers, I put more weight on the native panel rate, VRR support, and ALLM than on the larger acceleration figure. If a gaming PC is also part of your setup, check its output settings and the TV’s documentation for the exact supported modes.
Plan HDMI connections before buying
Both TVs claim four HDMI 2.1 ports, but the supplied information differentiates them: two are specified for 4K at 144Hz, and two for 4K at 60Hz. That can matter if you want to connect a console, another console or PC, a streaming device, and an audio system without frequently swapping cables. The product details identify HDMI 4 as the eARC port. I’d confirm which sockets support your desired video mode and audio arrangement in the manual, especially if a soundbar will occupy one input. Port count alone does not mean every input has identical bandwidth or features.
Consider HDR and room lighting
The U85 descriptions list MiniLED backlighting with local dimming, up to 1,000 nits of brightness, and support for Dolby Vision formats and HDR10+. These features can help games and movies show brighter highlights and more varied contrast, though the supplied specifications do not provide independent picture measurements. Dolby Vision IQ is described as adapting to room light, while Dolby Vision Gaming targets compatible console content. I’d treat format support as a useful match for supported content rather than a guarantee that every game will use every HDR feature. For a bright room, check where the TV will face and how much direct light reaches the screen.
Decide whether the built-in sound is enough
Each model lists a 50W, 2.1-channel system with Dolby Atmos and DTS Virtual:X, plus eARC for an external audio system. That gives the TV a broader audio feature set than a basic stereo display, but format labels and power ratings do not establish how convincing sound will be in your room. If dialogue clarity or stronger low-frequency impact matters, plan for a soundbar or receiver and confirm the eARC connection works with your chosen setup. The supplied information points to HDMI 4 as eARC, so account for that port when planning your console connections.
Separate everyday extras from gaming priorities
Google TV, voice control, and casting support make either set usable as a streaming display when the console is off. Hotel mode and IP/IR control may help property operators or managed installations, but most home gamers should not let those extras decide between the sizes. My order of priorities would be screen fit, useful HDMI inputs, native refresh and VRR support, then smart-TV and audio features. The two models share much of the platform, so the 65U85’s main case is its larger screen and higher listed contrast, while the 55U85 wins when compact placement is the real need.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which iFFALCON U85 is better for PS5 and Xbox?
I’d choose the 65U85 for a larger room and the 55U85 for closer seating or limited space. Both are described with a native 144Hz panel, VRR, ALLM, and four HDMI 2.1 ports, so the central gaming feature set is similar. The 65-inch model has a higher listed contrast ratio and a larger screen; the 55-inch model is more compact. Neither should be chosen solely for its higher headline acceleration figure.
Can PS5 or Xbox games run at 144Hz on these TVs?
The supplied information says both TVs have native 144Hz panels and two HDMI inputs specified for 4K at 144Hz. That does not mean every PS5 or Xbox game runs at 144 frames per second. Actual output depends on the console, game, resolution, and available performance mode. I’d check the game’s supported modes and the console’s video settings rather than treating the panel specification as a guaranteed frame rate.
What is the difference between the 288Hz and 240Hz claims?
The 65U85 description states VRR up to 288Hz, while the 55U85 listing specifies 240Hz DLG acceleration. Both also list a native 144Hz panel. These maximum figures are not directly interchangeable, and neither establishes that a console game can deliver that frame rate. For a PS5 or Xbox purchase, I’d give greater weight to the shared native panel rating, VRR support, and confirmed port modes.
Do all four HDMI ports support 4K at 144Hz?
No. The supplied product descriptions say that two HDMI ports support 4K at 144Hz and the other two support 4K at 60Hz. They also identify HDMI 4 as the eARC connection. Since port capabilities affect how you connect a console, PC, and soundbar, I’d verify the labels and manual for the exact port assignment before setting up the system.
Should I use the built-in speakers or add a soundbar?
Both TVs list a 50W 2.1-channel audio system with Dolby Atmos and DTS Virtual:X, which may be enough for everyday viewing in some rooms. If you want more room-filling sound, stronger bass, or a dedicated audio setup, plan for an external soundbar or receiver using eARC. I would not assume that a format label or speaker power figure alone predicts how the TV will sound in your particular room.
Conclusion
For a larger living room, I recommend the 65U85: it combines the same core U85 gaming features with a 65-inch screen and the higher listed contrast ratio. For a compact room or closer seating, I recommend the 55U85: it retains the 144Hz, VRR, ALLM, and HDMI feature set in a more manageable size. If you are deciding between them for PS5 or Xbox, prioritize screen fit and the HDMI ports you plan to use; I would treat the 288Hz and 240Hz claims as secondary, since both panels are listed as native 144Hz and console output depends on game support.
