Choosing a KVM over IP switch means deciding how you want to reach a computer when you cannot sit in front of it. The GL.iNet Comet PoE is my pick for a wired server setup that can use PoE and store system images; the PiKVM V4 Plus suits buyers who value open-source control and several connection options; and the JetKVM favors responsive 1080p60 access with a touchscreen. These devices differ in how they connect, what video they handle, and how much setup they invite. None of the five is a multi-host rack switch: each is described for controlling one connected computer or server, so a larger fleet may need a different arrangement.
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- The GL.iNet Comet PoE combines 4K30 capture, PoE power, and 32 GB of onboard storage, but supports one device and needs a separately sold extension for remote power control.
- PiKVM V4 Plus offers 1080p or 1200p at 60 Hz with Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and cellular connectivity; cellular access may require extra setup or equipment.
- JetKVM pairs 1080p60 streaming and BIOS-level access with a touchscreen, while open-source customization makes it a better fit for technically confident owners.
- GL.iNet Comet GL-RM1 and Comet Pro both top out at 4K30; the RM1 is a wired, compact option, while the Pro adds Wi-Fi 6 and a touchscreen.
- All five picks are single-host devices, so buyers seeking one switch to select among multiple computers should check host capacity before choosing.
| GL.iNet GL-RM10 Comet Pro Remote KVM Over Wi‑Fi 6 Dual Band 4K Passthrough |  | Best for flexible Wi-Fi access | Video: 4K passthrough at 30 FPS | Network: Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 and wired connectivity | Remote access: Built-in Tailscale with WireGuard | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| JetKVM IP KVM Over IP Ethernet Remote Access with Touchscreen LCD, 1080P@60FPS, BIOS-Level Control via HDMI & USB-C |  | Best for responsive 1080p control | Video: 1080p at 60 FPS | Latency: 30–60 ms | Connections: Ethernet, HDMI, USB-C | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| GL.iNet Comet GL-RM1 Remote KVM, 4K at 30 Hz with BIOS Control |  | Best compact wired 4K pick | Model: GL-RM1 | Video: 3840 × 2160 at 30 Hz | Network speed: 1,000 Mb/s | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| GL.iNet Comet PoE Remote KVM with Tailscale and 4K Streaming |  | Best for PoE server setups | Model: GL-RM1PE-US | Video: 4K at 30 Hz; H.264 hardware encoding | Power: PoE and 5 V USB Type-C | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| PiKVM V4 Plus KVM over IP |  | Best for open-source connectivity options | Maximum resolution: 1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz | Connectivity: Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular | Storage: Internal USB 3.0 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| kvm over ip switch | Video | Power |
|---|---|---|
| GL.iNet GL-RM10 Comet Pro Remo | 4K passthrough at 30 FPS | 5 V, 3 W |
| JetKVM IP KVM Over IP Ethernet | 1080p at 60 FPS | USB-C/5 V or DC 12–20 V |
| GL.iNet Comet GL-RM1 Remote KV | 3840 × 2160 at 30 Hz | — |
| GL.iNet Comet PoE Remote KVM w | 4K at 30 Hz; H.264 hardware encoding | PoE and 5 V USB Type-C |
| PiKVM V4 Plus KVM over IP | — | 12 V DC, 24 W |
More Details on Our Top Picks
GL.iNet GL-RM10 Comet Pro Remote KVM Over Wi‑Fi 6 Dual Band 4K Passthrough
The Comet Pro is the most flexible network fit among the two GL.iNet 4K picks: it supports dual-band Wi-Fi 6 alongside wired connectivity, whereas the GL-RM1 and Comet PoE are presented as Ethernet-based options. That can simplify placement when a network cable is awkward, and built-in Tailscale gives remote users a WireGuard-based access route. Its 2.22-inch touchscreen also offers local status and control without relying solely on a browser or app.
Video is the main compromise. This model passes through 4K at 30 FPS, matching the other GL.iNet choices here but falling behind the JetKVM and PiKVM V4 Plus for 60 Hz operation at their stated resolutions. That is a reasonable trade for managing a server, but a weaker fit for fast cursor movement or visually fluid work. It controls one host, and the supplied details do not describe a built-in multi-host switch. I would choose it over the RM1 when wireless flexibility and a screen matter; I would choose the wired Comet PoE when PoE power and image storage are more useful.
Pros:- Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 plus wired connectivity gives more placement options than the Ethernet-focused GL.iNet picks.
- Built-in Tailscale supports encrypted remote access.
- A 2.22-inch touchscreen provides local interface access.
- 4K passthrough and two-way audio support detailed remote support sessions.
Cons:- 4K is limited to 30 FPS, below the 60 Hz modes stated for JetKVM and PiKVM.
- The single input position does not provide multi-computer switching.
Best for: Owners managing one computer or server who want Wi-Fi 6, wired networking, and a local touchscreen in the same device.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need 60 Hz video, native multi-host switching, or a fully described remote power-control setup.
- Video:4K passthrough at 30 FPS
- Network:Dual-band Wi-Fi 6 and wired connectivity
- Remote access:Built-in Tailscale with WireGuard
- Audio:Two-way audio
- Display:2.22-inch touchscreen
- Host capacity:One input position
- Power:5 V, 3 W
Our verdict“I recommend the Comet Pro when wireless flexibility and a local screen matter more than 60 Hz video or multi-host control.”
JetKVM IP KVM Over IP Ethernet Remote Access with Touchscreen LCD, 1080P@60FPS, BIOS-Level Control via HDMI & USB-C
JetKVM makes the clearest case for buyers who want fluid remote interaction rather than 4K capture: its stated 1080p at 60 FPS and 30–60 ms latency target responsive control. It also provides BIOS-level access through a browser, useful for work that begins before an operating system loads. Compared with the GL.iNet devices, it trades their 4K30 mode for a higher refresh rate at 1080p, which is a more practical balance for routine server administration and desktop support.
The built-in touchscreen adds a glanceable local interface, and open-source customization may appeal to owners who want to adapt the system. That flexibility comes with a setup cost: the product description explicitly calls for technical knowledge, and its hardware expansion options are not detailed. Remote power features are mentioned, but an extension is sold separately. I would place JetKVM ahead of the 4K GL.iNet models for smoother 1080p work, but behind them for buyers whose priority is 4K passthrough. It is a single-host tool in this lineup, not a switch for a rack of computers.
Pros:- BIOS-level remote control works without extra software on the host.
- 1080p at 60 FPS supports smoother interaction than the 4K30 GL.iNet models.
- Touchscreen LCD gives a local status and control interface.
- Open-source customization supports adaptable workflows.
Cons:- Setup and customization may demand technical experience.
- Extension power control is sold separately.
- Hardware expansion options are not clearly specified.
Best for: IT administrators and technically confident owners who want BIOS access, a touchscreen, and responsive 1080p streaming.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need 4K capture, a beginner-oriented setup, or remote power control without an additional extension.
- Video:1080p at 60 FPS
- Latency:30–60 ms
- Connections:Ethernet, HDMI, USB-C
- Remote control:BIOS-level browser access
- Display:Touchscreen LCD
- Customization:Open-source system
- Power:USB-C/5 V or DC 12–20 V
Our verdict“I would choose JetKVM for fluid 1080p BIOS access when open-source flexibility is worth a more technical setup.”
GL.iNet Comet GL-RM1 Remote KVM, 4K at 30 Hz with BIOS Control
The GL-RM1 is the straightforward wired member of the GL.iNet group. It captures 4K at 30 Hz, supports BIOS control, and offers audio and file transfer, while requiring no additional software on the host. Its 85 g plastic enclosure is compact, and the listed Ethernet interface reaches 1 Gbps. Compared with the Comet Pro, it gives up Wi-Fi and a touchscreen; compared with the Comet PoE, it gives up PoE and onboard image storage. That leaner feature set makes sense when a wired connection is already available and those extras would go unused.
As with the other 4K GL.iNet devices, the 30 Hz ceiling suits administration more than fast-moving visual work. The product notes that PD adapters cannot be used, which narrows power choices and is worth checking against an existing setup. The PoE model is a better fit for a server area where reducing adapter clutter matters, while the JetKVM offers 60 Hz at 1080p for smoother motion. I see the RM1 as a compact single-host KVM for remote maintenance rather than a general-purpose multi-computer switch.
Pros:- BIOS-level control supports rebooting and operating system installation.
- 4K capture, audio, and file transfer cover common remote maintenance tasks.
- Host computer requires no additional software.
- Compact 85 g enclosure and 1 Gbps Ethernet suit a fixed wired installation.
Cons:- 4K video is limited to 30 Hz.
- PD adapters are not supported.
- It lacks the Pro’s Wi-Fi and touchscreen and the PoE model’s onboard storage.
Best for: A buyer who wants compact wired 4K30 BIOS access, file transfer, and remote audio without host software.
Not ideal for: Anyone who needs Wi-Fi, PoE, 60 Hz video, or compatibility with a PD adapter.
- Model:GL-RM1
- Video:3840 × 2160 at 30 Hz
- Network speed:1,000 Mb/s
- Interfaces:Ethernet, HDMI, USB 2.0, USB Type-C
- Encoding:H.264 hardware encoding
- Size:3.15 × 2.36 × 0.68 in
- Weight:85 g
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“I would pick the RM1 for a compact wired 4K maintenance station when its power limitation and 30 Hz video fit the job.”
GL.iNet Comet PoE Remote KVM with Tailscale and 4K Streaming
For a wired server location, the Comet PoE has the most practical infrastructure-focused bundle among these picks. PoE and USB-C power give installation choices, and its 32 GB eMMC can store system images for reinstallation tasks. The GL-RM1 shares 4K30 capture and hardware H.264 encoding, but lacks the PoE model’s listed image storage; the Comet Pro adds Wi-Fi, while this unit focuses on Ethernet and power over the network cable. Two-way audio adds a useful support channel without changing its single-host design.
There are limits to that server-room appeal. Like the RM1 and Pro, it tops out at 4K at 30 Hz, so JetKVM or PiKVM is more attractive when 60 Hz video is the deciding factor. Remote power control also depends on an optional ATX Board or Fingerbot extension, so PoE alone should not be mistaken for remote power switching. I would favor this over the standard RM1 when PoE and stored images simplify the installation; buyers who need a touchscreen or wireless network access should look at the Comet Pro instead.
Pros:- PoE can reduce the need for a separate power adapter.
- 32 GB eMMC provides space for system images.
- 4K30 capture, H.264 encoding, and two-way audio support remote maintenance.
- PoE and USB-C power options offer installation flexibility.
Cons:- 4K streaming is limited to 30 Hz.
- ATX Board or Fingerbot extensions for remote power control are sold separately.
- The device supports one connected computer or server.
Best for: A server owner with Ethernet and PoE infrastructure who wants image storage and 4K remote capture for one host.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking 60 Hz video, built-in multi-host selection, or remote power control without optional hardware.
- Model:GL-RM1PE-US
- Video:4K at 30 Hz; H.264 hardware encoding
- Power:PoE and 5 V USB Type-C
- Storage:32 GB eMMC
- Audio:Two-way audio
- Connections:Ethernet and HDMI
- Host capacity:One device
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“I recommend the Comet PoE for a wired, single-server installation where PoE and onboard image storage matter more than 60 Hz video.”
PiKVM V4 Plus KVM over IP
PiKVM V4 Plus takes a different route from the GL.iNet 4K models: it supports up to 1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz and lists Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular connectivity. That combination suits a buyer who values connection alternatives and smooth 1080p-class control over 4K capture. Its open-source KVM design and internal USB 3.0 storage also make it a distinctive choice for server owners who want a device with room for their own configuration and workflow.
Compared with JetKVM, PiKVM lists more network paths and a metal enclosure, while JetKVM specifies a touchscreen and a latency range. Compared with the Comet PoE, PiKVM trades 4K30 video and PoE for 60 Hz at a lower resolution and cellular capability. Cellular may call for extra equipment or setup, so it does not automatically provide an effortless backup connection. The supplied details also do not specify the same BIOS feature set as the other models. I would consider it for connectivity flexibility and open-source preferences, but buyers who need 4K capture or clearly stated BIOS control should compare the alternatives closely.
Pros:- Supports resolutions up to 1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz.
- Lists Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular connectivity.
- Open-source design supports configurable workflows.
- Metal enclosure and included power and connection cables make it a substantial kit.
Cons:- Cellular access may need extra setup or equipment.
- Its maximum listed resolution is below the 4K GL.iNet models.
- The supplied product details do not specify a touchscreen or BIOS-level feature set.
Best for: A server owner prioritizing open-source KVM, 60 Hz 1080p-class video, and multiple possible network paths.
Not ideal for: Buyers who require 4K capture, simple cellular setup, or a clearly specified touchscreen and BIOS workflow.
- Maximum resolution:1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular
- Storage:Internal USB 3.0
- Power:12 V DC, 24 W
- Controller connections:USB-C and HDMI
- Enclosure:Metal
- Dimensions:4.72 × 2.68 × 1.73 in
- Weight:0.35 kg
Our verdict“I would choose PiKVM V4 Plus when open-source flexibility and varied network paths outweigh 4K capture and a simpler setup.”
How We Picked
I compared the five supplied options by the decisions that matter for remote computer access: whether they support BIOS-level control, their stated video resolution and frame rate, connection and power choices, and the effort or extras involved in setup. I gave more weight to features that change day-to-day fit than to a long spec list. For example, PoE and onboard storage make the Comet PoE a distinct server-room choice, while Wi-Fi and cellular options make the PiKVM V4 Plus more adaptable to locations without a convenient wired path.
I ranked the lineup by how clearly each device meets a common KVM over IP use case, then separated specialist picks by their strengths. The JetKVM leads for responsive 1080p60 control and a local touchscreen; the GL.iNet models stand out for 4K30 capture and different power or network arrangements. I also counted drawbacks in the recommendation: 4K at 30 Hz is less suited to fast-moving content, optional power accessories add complexity, and open-source customization can ask more of the owner. The descriptions list all five as single-host devices, so I do not treat them as substitutes for a multi-computer switching matrix.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Kvm Over Ip Switch
I would start with the job the KVM must do remotely, then match resolution, connection, and power features to that job. A KVM over IP can provide access to a single host from elsewhere, but the five devices here differ in how smooth the video is, what network paths they accept, and whether remote power tasks need extra hardware.Check whether you need one host or several
Despite the word “switch,” these picks are described for one connected device each. That is a fit for remote access to a single server or workstation, but it does not give you a button to select between several hosts. If your goal is to manage a rack, confirm that the device you buy can switch among the required computers or plan for a separate multi-host arrangement. The Comet Pro’s single input position and the Comet PoE’s one-device limit make this especially clear.
Choose resolution and refresh rate for the work
The three GL.iNet choices list 4K at 30 Hz, which provides more detail for static administration and installation screens. JetKVM lists 1080p at 60 FPS, and PiKVM supports up to 1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz. Those lower-resolution modes can appear smoother during cursor movement and video playback. I would prioritize 4K when reading detailed interfaces matters; for fluid remote desktop interaction, the 60 Hz models are stronger candidates.
Match network access to the installation
Ethernet is the natural choice for a fixed server position with a reliable wired network. The Comet PoE can also receive power over that connection, while the Comet Pro adds dual-band Wi-Fi 6. PiKVM lists Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and cellular, although cellular may require extra equipment or configuration. Think through the actual network route to the host and the remote user, including whether the device will have wired access and how you intend to secure remote sessions.
Separate BIOS control from remote power
BIOS-level access lets an administrator interact with a computer before its operating system starts, which is useful for recovery and installation. JetKVM and the GL-RM1 explicitly describe BIOS control. Remote power is a separate capability: the Comet PoE supports separately sold ATX Board or Fingerbot extensions, and JetKVM’s extension power control is also an add-on. Check what the specific package includes before assuming you can remotely switch a host off and on.
Weigh setup effort and local controls
A touchscreen can help when someone is physically near the KVM or when a quick local status check is useful; the Comet Pro and JetKVM include one in their descriptions. JetKVM’s open-source customization is appealing for owners comfortable with technical setup. PiKVM also emphasizes open-source use. If you want a simpler wired appliance, the GL-RM1 has fewer listed extras, though its PD adapter limitation narrows power choices. Choose the amount of configuration you actually want to maintain.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a KVM over IP device do?
A KVM over IP device lets you control a computer or server remotely by carrying its keyboard, video, and mouse signals over a network. Some models also provide BIOS-level access, audio, file transfer, or power-control options. The specific features vary: JetKVM and the GL-RM1 describe BIOS control, while power management may depend on an additional extension.
Do these five products switch between multiple computers?
The supplied descriptions position these devices as single-host products. The Comet Pro lists one input position, and the Comet PoE lists support for one device. If you need to select among several computers from one unit, confirm multi-host support directly before buying; none of these descriptions establishes that capability.
Is 4K at 30 Hz better than 1080p at 60 Hz for remote access?
It depends on the work. The GL.iNet models’ 4K30 mode gives more image detail, which may help with small text or dense interfaces. JetKVM’s 1080p60 mode and PiKVM’s 1920 × 1200 at 60 Hz offer a higher refresh rate, which can make movement look smoother. For remote server administration, either can work; choose based on whether detail or motion matters more.
Can I use one of these devices to power-cycle a server?
Remote power control is not the same as remote keyboard and video access. The Comet PoE supports an ATX Board or Fingerbot extension sold separately, and JetKVM’s extension power control is also listed as an add-on. Check the connection method and included components for the model you select, and do not assume that network access alone can turn a host on or off.
Which option makes sense when the server cannot use Ethernet?
The Comet Pro lists dual-band Wi-Fi 6, while PiKVM lists Wi-Fi and cellular as well as Ethernet. The Pro is the more direct choice if Wi-Fi and its touchscreen fit the rest of your needs; PiKVM suits buyers who want more network paths and are comfortable arranging cellular access if needed. Confirm that the available wireless network reaches the host location reliably and supports your remote-access setup.
Conclusion
I would pick the GL.iNet Comet PoE for a wired server installation where PoE and stored system images simplify maintenance. For responsive 1080p BIOS work, JetKVM has the clearest case, provided its more technical setup and optional power extension suit you. Choose the Comet Pro when Wi-Fi 6 and a local touchscreen matter, or the GL-RM1 for compact wired 4K30 access without host software. PiKVM V4 Plus is the fit for open-source preferences and varied network paths, with cellular setup and its lower maximum resolution as tradeoffs. Before ordering any of them, confirm that a single-host device meets your switching needs.
